|
NATIONALIST MANIFESTO? 
The Nationalist Manifesto is the legal document that is the basis
for the movement to restore the national constitution of the United
States. Like any legal document it is somewhat technical, but
in that technical detail it constitutes an iron-clad guarantee
to the American people that the integrity of the government in
the United States shall be restored. Legal principles evolved
over thousands of years through experience and practice, but the
establishment of the republic after 1776 constituted a departure
from the common law that had prevailed in the United States for
over a century; the Restoration movement is an effort to restore
those legal principles to American life. The purpose of this paper
is to explain the Manifesto to laymen, who have no legal education.
Unlike the platforms of political parties, or the promises of
politicians, the Manifesto is a rock-solid legal document, signed,
sealed and guaranteed.
The preamble of the Manifesto sets out the general reasons that
the issuance of the Manifesto is necessary. It describes the state
of America in the late 20th century, as it "now
sinks in an ocean of crime and violence, under a system of government
that is powerless and impotent, and unable to restore social peace,
or law or justice." Starting out with an appeal to Americans
to answer the call of their bleeding homeland, the reader is reminded
that this is the "hour of need" that patriotic Americans
must respond to with action. "The time of indecision is
over."
Americans are reminded that the origin of the republic was as
an outlaw, a bastard child born from defiance of constituted law.
We are reminded of the ancient heritage of the American people,
and of how that heritage has been sold off by a political system
that has no anchor in law. The failure of the republic "in
the basic purpose of serving the national interest," is invoked
as the cause of the issuance of the Nationalist Manifesto, which
is an attempt to remedy this flaw by the restoration of constitutional
institutions.
The restoration process centers around the revival of the institution
of the Crown, which is provided for by the terms of the Nationalist
Manifesto. The Manifesto is an appeal made by the claimant to
the American Throne, calling upon the people of America "to
restore the integrity of the leadership of government." The
first actual clause of the document, following the preamble, the
Government clause, states forthrightly that the republic has failed
and must be dissolved. The failure of the republic is explained
as originating in "the corruption and embezzlements of its
leadership." The alternative proposed is a restoration of
traditional values through the vehicle of a "non-partisan
monarch restrained by a constitutional order…" The foundation
of this new government is to be a non-political monarchy that
delegates political power to the elected representatives of the
nation. Of course, the basis for this monarchy is the fact that
it is consistent with the customs of Anglo-American law since
time immemorial.
The strength of the Manifesto derives of its foundation in the
ancient customary law of the American people, which offers a prima
facie case against the republic based on its history. Instead
of serving as a form of continuity with the ancient laws of the
American nation, the republic is a point of departure, a deviation.
However, it has also been deliberately misrepresented to modern
people, because the founding fathers were not lovers of democratic
values, for the state they crafted was a bona fide
police state. The bottom line is that any society which is possessed
of the institution of slavery is automatically a police state,
because that is the only way it is possible for slavery to be
perpetuated.
The intent of the Manifesto is to restore popular acknowledgment
of the supremacy of the ancient constitution of America, constituted
of the observance of the inalienable and immutable legal rights
of individuals by the royal government of a national king. The
Manifesto, in effect, is the declaration of the intention of the
claimant to the American Throne to govern in accordance to law.
This necessitates the convening of the nation in a parliament,
the traditional representative institution, to give form to the
national will. The republic, in contrast, cannot give voice to
the national will because it was never designed to treat with
the American people as a sovereign nation.
The law as it has been known in the Anglo-American world for over
a thousand years is formulated by the king in council, in parliament.
This is not as a result of arbitrary arrangements, but because
of the evolution of constitutional principles of law over millennia.
The republic fails to fulfill these ancient conditions, and therefor
"the republic cannot bind the American people to its law."
Having no legal authority, the republic cannot be the source of
any process for the restoration of legal authority in the United
States. Instead, the authority to restore the monarchy in the
United States - the executive native to the ancient
constitution of America - exists in the people, as "represented
in a duly authorized and lawfully assembled parliament of all
the estates of the people of this realm." For that purpose
the claimant to the Throne has summoned a parliament to meet on
January 1st, 2001, on the first day of the first year
of the new millennium. And the first order of business for the
parliament shall be "to establish such that the laws and
liberties of this realm might not again be in danger of being
subverted, by passage of An Act Restoring the Crown of the United
States of America and Settling the Succession of the Crown."
The claimant to the American Throne is the chief of the common
law association Nation of America, who by virtue of the
Nationalist Manifesto established a claim upon the American Throne.
The Manifesto describes an intensely personal relationship between
the American people and their chief, Marc Eric Ely-Chaitlin of
the House of David. The document is signed, "Marc Eric, by
the Grace of God, King of the organization called the Nation of
America… do hereby pledge on Our Sacred Honor, to abide by
this Charter of 1993, upon the sitting of a lawfully assembled
parliament, should it see fit to invest Our Person with the Office
of King of the Government of America." But it also lays out
the operating principles of a transition from an illegitimate
republican system to the system provided for in great detail by
ancient law. The title of "Regent" assumed and used
by the traditional chief of the Americans, is used explicitly
for the purpose of describing the transitional state of the nation.
It indicates the acceptance of the claimant to the Throne of the
existence of the republic as the constituted authority, providing
the Regency as a focal point for a national dialogue regarding
the future of the American nation. The Regency is, in effect,
a legitimate political opposition to the institution of the republic,
based on the constitutional restoration of the ancient and traditional
American kingdom.
One of the most important things the restoration of the American
kingdom guarantees, is continuity and freedom. The restoration
of the American nation cannot take place upon the ash heap of
a civil war, because violence can never solve real problems. The
binding force of the American people, that combines them and makes
them into a nation, is "the customary and traditional rights,
liberties and obligations, and basic political freedom of individuals,
as embraced in all forms of putative American law, and the Common
Law." By the terms of the Continuity clause, the Manifesto
guarantees that the new government that shall take form under
the authority of the king shall observe all those rights Americans
possess not only due to English common law, but also due to the
practices of the American people for the last 220 years, since
the independence of the nation from Great Britain. While the republic
can never be viewed as legal, the practices of the people during
its existence do have legally binding effect, so that the freedom
of religion, freedom of the press, freedom of speech, etc., all
continue to be guaranteed even more solidly than the Bill of Rights
to the Constitution of 1787 guaranteed them. The only difference
is that under the constitution of the American kingdom these rights
are observed because they represent the exercise of sovereignty
by the people, which they have always possessed as a birthright,
in contrast to the legal theory of the republic, which views the
civil rights of the people as a "gift" of the Bill of
Rights, which the American people would otherwise not be entitled
to.
The language of parliaments also shows this difference, because
when the delegates of the nation meet in a legitimate parliament
they do not assert the right to make law, they assert the right
to re-claim rights that the people possessed in antiquity. The
fiction of the republic is that law is something the Congress
makes, which the President must sign. The "legislation"
of the republic, couched in the pseudo-legal terminology of the
republic, deceives the people, so that the existence of the ancient
submerged constitution is obscured. Then when the dictator of
the system sets out to carry-out the "legislation" of
the Congress, the President is set on a collision course with
the nation, for the oath of the President is to protect and defend
the Constitution of the republic against all enemies, "foreign
and domestic." The oath of the king, on the other hand, does
not set the king up against any of the American people. The Regent
of the United States observes no domestic enemies among the American
people.
The foundation of the American kingdom is based on the reconciliation
of the American people of all ethnic backgrounds. The Regency
is a concrete alternative to the gaudy decadent republican regime
sinking into the Potomac in a swirl of its own sewage. Where the
republic embodies a perpetuation of fixed politics, the restoration
of the monarchy embodies a democratic representative option that
stands to electrify the political landscape of the United States
by empowering individuals through recognition of their ancient,
ancestral rights and traditional liberties. The Regent cannot
become king without the full participation of the nation through
a parliament, and as a just and merciful man, the Regent has guaranteed
the safety of all the supporters of the republic by the terms
of the Amnesty clause, granting them amnesty in an appeal to the
common bonds of nationalism. By pardoning the adherents of the
republic the Regent demonstrates his intention to found the restored
kingdom upon goodwill and goodfaith, instead of recriminations
over political differences. The only exceptions being in cases
of serious high crimes, once discovered by the legitimate government
of the king upon its establishment, prosecutable by due process
of law.
The real spirit of the Manifesto is contained in the National
Service clause, which states unequivocally that "America
is in a state of crisis." The Government of the King shall
be founded upon patriotic service to the motherland, America.
The king commits to serve the nation for the entirety of his life,
and the monarch must, in turn, call upon the whole people to "commit
themselves to the service of the Nation," to resolve the
crisis. The Service clause declares the intention of the claimant
to the Throne "to call on the best minds of the living generations,
to utilize the true powers of America, to end the escalating crises
which now bury us, and which threaten the very existence of America."
The National Service clause, naturally, is followed by the Political
Corruption clause, which states that "any public servant
or representative who conducts business to his or her own interest
or benefit, at the expense of the national interest, shall be
prosecuted for violation of the public trust…" However,
it should be understood that the way these principles have to
be applied is dependent upon the formation of an American national
parliament, which will be entrusted with carrying into effect
the clauses of the Manifesto, which upon the restoration of the
Crown would become the Charter of 1993. The Manifesto is in fact
a kind of contract offer to the American people, and upon their
acceptance of this offer, the Manifesto would become a charter,
binding upon all succeeding monarchs of the Kingdom of the United
States of America.
The Manifesto sets forth a theme that the American people can
comprehend, providing for the transition from the republic to
the kingdom. The first burden of the restored kingdom is to address
the debts of the corrupt and collapsing republic. The kingdom
will accept responsibility for the affairs of the republic, but
"all funds traceable to the treasury of the republic shall
be subject to repatriation to the Government of America of the
King." Because the history of republics has included massive
embezzlements, should the legitimate and patriotic Government
of America of the King find that the bureaucrats of the republic
entered into hasty transactions in the final days of the republic,
to transfer national wealth to themselves or others, those transactions
shall be reversed. The most important authority the Government
of the King of the United States must possess is moral authority.
By ancient and established laws the legitimate Armed Forces of
the nation may only be recruited in the name of a lawful king.
The dissolution of the republic by legal process shall necessitate
the transfer of the command of the Armed Forces to the King of
the United States of America. The king as commander-in-chief of
the nation's Armed Forces obliges the king - a civilian
- to stand at the head of the fighting men and women of the nation,
and to share with the veterans of the Army, Navy, Air Force and
Special Services, the same risks of his person, as they are obliged
to make by their oaths of loyalty to the American Nation. The
king is not a paper leader, like Presidents of the republic.
The Government of the King is a personal relationship between
the people and the king, it is not a ritualized relationship,
such as the American people have had with their Presidents, which
has elevated the Presidency to the position of near idolatry.
Royal authority obliges, it is part of the compact
between the king - the living fountain of law - and the people.
The exercise of royal authority is dependent upon the conventions
of the ancient constitution, which put the authority of the king
at the disposal of the ministers of the elected Government in
parliament. Integral to this obligation of the king to the nation
is the upholding of the fundamental human rights of all the people
of the nation, charging the Government of the king with the ancient
duty of guardian of the people's rights. The Human Rights clause
of the Manifesto asserts that the foundation of the king's authority
is based upon protecting and defending the equal human rights
of all American nationals. "The violation of any person's
human rights shall not be tolerated, and all individuals shall
be entitled to the equal protection of the due process of the
law, which may be called the Protection of the Crown."
The restoration of the ancient constitution of the American kingdom
shall involve the unification of the country into a single nation,
which will have the end effect of reducing the independence of
state governments. The State Governments clause of the Manifesto
establishes a basis for the transition of authority from the republic
to the monarchy, without obliterating the historical divisions
of the country. "No government of any state shall be of the
force of law, unless accredited by the assent of the king-regnant.
The monarch may determine, in consultation with the constituent
assemblies and duly elected representatives of the people, the
boundaries of any state… For the Order of the Nation, states,
counties, cities and towns and other governmental units, shall
continue to operate, as if under the assent of the King's Government,
under the color of law." This is to say that the new Government
of the King shall not interfere with the processes of local government,
although pursuant to the practices of the ancient constitution,
all authority of government shall be subject to the royal authority
of the King of the United States, once established. Of course,
that authority would only be exercised by the democratically elected
Government that would derive from the American parliament.
The Welfare and Education clauses of the Manifesto address the
spirit the Regent wants to kindle within America, whereby the
country is strengthened by its investment in the people of the
nation. The republic uses welfare to buy off the discontent of
the masses of poor; the kingdom will offer welfare as a device
for making dependents capable of attaining independence; and people
who have genuine needs shall be cared for on the humanitarian
basis that civilized nations do not allow their own people to
perish by neglect. The republic has historically been threatened
by a unified population, but the American kingdom shall only be
able to thrive if the population attains unity. Therefore the
kingdom shall feed on the dissolution of the republic. Education
is the primary origin of the notions most people possess regarding
their country and its institutions, but the Manifesto derives
of the true experience of history, instead of the creedal fictions
of the republic. To empower the American people, it is required
that they come to comprehend the genuine historic record of the
republic, so that they can act to protect the ancient constitution
which guarantees their freedom under law. It is for that purpose
that the Manifesto sets forth terms that will preserve the principle
of public funding of education, for the purpose of promoting an
enlightened population. The Manifesto also puts into legal terms
the principle that public schools shall be dedicated to education,
instead of indoctrination, and unnecessary bureaucracy. Educational
institutions should not maintain vast wealth in stock portfolios
and art collections, while the costs to students in fees are rising.
Instead, the resources of educational institutions should all
be dedicated to fulfilling the role of empowering individual Americans
with the knowledge they require to function in a free society,
something the existing school system has failed to do with flying
colors. Again, the specifics on how these changes would be carried
into effect would be left to the terms decided by a democratically
elected national parliament.
The most important clauses of the Manifesto have to do with how
the Nationalist Movement shall address the dissolution of the
republic. The Nationalist Movement derives all strength from the
patriotism of the American people to the traditional law of the
nation, which was restored on 11 April, 1993, by the Cry of Stillwater
Bay. The progress of the Nationalist Movement is cumulative, as
individual Americans discover the restoration of traditional institutions,
for simple knowledge of the existence of the traditional nation
has the end effect of inducting the patriotic individual into
it. There is no "joining" of the Nation of America.
There is no loyalty oath or pledge of allegiance, and no one is
sworn to uphold a divided nation, as the republic's oaths swear
its officers, who are obliged to protect the Constitution of the
republic from all of its enemies, "foreign and domestic."
The Nationalist Movement gives Americans the benefit of the doubt
that as Americans, they are loyal to America.
The very nature of the republic causes its public support to erode,
and the very nature of the American kingdom causes its public
support to increase, and the ultimate victory of the restoration
of the ancient constitution is just a matter of time. Therefore
it is necessary for the Government of the kingdom to take into
consideration how it shall address the transition of the country
to a constitutional monarchy. For that purpose the Taxes clause
of the Manifesto starts out with a definition of the "Spirit
of the Government of America of the King." This Spirit has
to be carried into effect by the Acts of Parliament, but it is
a direct statement of the will of the claimant to the American
Throne, should he succeed to the Crown of America.
The intention of the Taxes clause is to draw a distinction between
the financial regime of the republic, and the financial policies
of the restored American kingdom, so as to make it clear that
the kingdom shall constitute a total breach with the past. The
tax structure of the republic has been confiscatory for the majority
of America's working people, followed by expenditures by the republic
without accountability. The "Spirit of the Government of
America of the King shall be to protect national resources for
the good of the Nation, and to conserve the national treasure,
never to waste it." This defines the government as a caretaker
of property that belongs to the whole American people, which it
must actually use to their benefit, instead of against them.
The Taxes clause flat out declares that the new Government of
America of the King would abolish the income tax and inheritance
tax, and the Internal Revenue Service. The specific wording of
the clause reads: "The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) would
be unilaterally abolished and disbanded." The purpose of
this is to answer the cries of anguish at the outrages committed
by the IRS against the American people, which will only be satisfied
with the complete and total abolition of the IRS as a governmental
agency. A national sales tax of 5% is provided for, pursuant to
implementation by Act of Parliament, which is to supplement a
National Trust constituted of the assets of the nation now held
by the republic, including land, minerals, timber, oil and real
estate, which shall be dedicated to filling the needs of the American
people. By cautious management of the assets of the American people,
there is no need for them to pay an income tax. The financial
organization of the kingdom provides for the collection and accounting
for all public funds by the democratically elected Government
in parliament, with the assent of the king. These simple acts
will bring order to the finances of the country, and enable forensic
accountings of the republic to take place, to give the American
people a truthful understanding of the real scope of the embezzlements
that have taken place since 1776.
The bottom line is that the Federal Government is out of control,
and the only way to really get it under control is to shut it
down, something that must be done by the majority of the American
people by acts of passive non-violent resistance. The only way
to coordinate mass actions of passive resistance is to organize
a legitimate transitional institution, which is what the Regency
of the United States was organized to provide. The goal of the
kingdom is to peacefully confront the republic with its own obsolescence,
so that the Congress shall actually vote for its own dissolution.
In practical terms by the time this takes place the Congress will
be irrelevant.
The Federal Employees clause of the Manifesto was designed specifically
to address the actual transition of the republic's officials to
the new kingdom. The spirit of the transition embodied by the
Manifesto is one of magnanimity, and the Employees clause releases
Federal Employees from the civil service of the republic, who
are obliged by their association with the republic to "patriotically
swear or affirm allegiance to the Government of America of the
King." The Employees clause sets forth the circumstances
for the termination of the legal authority of the republic, which
"shall expire upon the investiture of the King by Act of
Parliament," all agencies of the government "subject
to renewal by Act of Parliament." The purpose of this is
to cause a real, ground-up reconstitution of the national government
to restore the confidence of the American people in their own
government. The Federal Government is so sprawling and monolithic,
no one is really sure how extensive it is, how rich it is, or
what its agents have been up to. By shutting it down, and boxing
up all the documents and archives of the Federal Government, it
will be possible for the new Government of America of the King
to assess the damage done to the American people by the institution
of the republic. The Royal Court of the Regent of the United States
sits at Stillwater Bay, in Dana Point, California. When the parliament
meets at Dana Point in 2001, the heart of the traditional nation
will be at Stillwater Bay, and the Capitol in Washington, D.C.
will be a mausoleum to the republic, with the relevance of a museum.
The Charter clause binds the claimant to the Throne to regard
the Manifesto as a legally binding promise to the American people,
conditioned upon the claimant being invested with the Office of
King of the United States of America by Act of Parliament. The
effect of the Act of Parliament would be to accept the Manifesto,
which would become law as the Charter of 1993.
The final clause of the Manifesto, the Representation clause,
sets forth authority for the dissolving of the Congress of the
republic, and the "representation of the people… to
take place in accordance to the ancient laws of this nation, by
a parliament of all the estates of the people of this realm."
The Representation clause also re-affirms the principle of the
supremacy of parliament, empowering parliament with the jurisdiction
to carry out the policies enunciated in the Manifesto, "according
to the will of the American people."
The Manifesto sets out a legal guarantee that binds the claimant
to the American Throne, so that individuals who accept the authority
of the Regent of the United States know what shall take place
when the Crown is restored, and the Regent is invested with the
full legal office of King of the United States of America. The
Manifesto is a public proclamation to all Americans that offers
them an alternative to the republic. The Manifesto offers America
hope, while the republic implodes from its own overbearing weight.
The Manifesto ends with "Time is of the essence…
If the thought of Restoration can be thought, the deed is also
close at hand."
The Manifesto, however, is not to be thought of as a replacement
constitution for the Constitution of 1787. Instead, it is closer
to the Magna Carta of 1215, a declaration of legal principles
as they have always been, rather than any kind of source of institutional
power. The Manifesto initiates a dialogue between the people and
the monarchy, and their acceptance of the restored monarchy has
constitutional significance. Legal authority exists in persons,
and their rights to exercise that authority is derived of ancient
conventions. That is why scholars say that the Anglo-American
constitution is "unwritten," because it is not contained
in a single enactment. Instead, it is a body of legal principles
and statutes and conventions that define the constitutional powers
of legal persons, and the guarantor of those legal persons, the
monarch.
The Manifesto is the appeal of the American chief to the American
people, to come together and become a nation. If the American
people answer this call, and form a nation by coming together,
their actions will give life to the nation. Deeds are written
in blood and sweat, while words are lost in the wind. The republic
is predatory and punitive, and every day it turns Americans away
from loyalty to it. In desperation they come upon the Nation of
America, where they are welcomed and honored. The vision of the
Regency of the United States gives hope that the American future
shall be positive and humanitarian; the Regency is founded upon
the notion that the American people are innately good, which it
invokes by its very existence. By calling forth the nobility in
people, it stimulates individuals to make contributions to humanity
that make them immortal by the greatness of their hearts. In the
end, the armies of the republic can seize territory, but they
cannot hold the land. The land exists in the hearts of the American
people, and like a jealous lover, once spurned they will never
return to the republic's iron grip.
|
|