The
American
National
Parliament

Modern Americans are faced with the historic reality of the Federal Government, which has never been the benevolent institution portrayed by the mass media. The majority of Founding Fathers were slaveowners and they were avowed racists. The republic they created is basically a garrison state, which to this day looks upon the population with suspicion. (This day, the republic has 1.6 million Americans held in penal servitude). The Constitution of 1787, the invention of the Founding Fathers, never mentions the freedoms or rights of the American people, instead it enumerates in detail the powers and privileges that shall be wielded by the Federal Government. The notion that the Constitution of 1787 and the Bill of Rights "give" Americans their civil and legal rights suggests that these rights are a gift of the Federal Government, which ordinary Americans should feel grateful for. This is in fact a fraud because the source of every American's legal right to political freedom is ancient custom and tradition, which Americans inherit on a hereditary basis.

The reason Americans inherit their civil rights is because the American legal system is based on a submerged ancient constitution, which is basically identical to the unwritten British Constitution. If it were not for the ancient constitution, the Constitution of 1787 would be unenforceable. This is because the precedents of the ancient constitution are essential to the implementation of the Constitution of the republic. The only problem is that the Constitution of the republic -- written by distressed businessmen and plantation aristocrats who used their position as authors of the fundamental law to enrich themselves - - has led us to a condition today wherein the nation is dissolving in violence, while corruption enables the wholesale embezzlement of the national wealth of the American people.

The institutions of the republic set up in the Constitution of 1787 were designed to shortcircuit the older laws in which human beings had protections due to centuries of determinations by duly constituted courts of law. In the common law it was unlawful to poison a river or stream, or build a building that blocked out a neighbor's light or air. Families had rights to the loyalty of their members that were enforceable at law, and the nation had to rely on the patriotism and love of the people rather than the threat of punishment and imprisonment, to rally them to the national cause. These ancient laws were set aside so that corporations could get rich in manufactures that destroyed rivers, lakes and streams across north America. Instead of encouraging family members to be loyal to their own kinfolk, the republic of the slavemasters made every citizen an informant, twisting the logic of family values to what we know today.

The first state in the modern world to practice "ethnic cleansing" was the United States, when it "removed" the native Americans. But the United States Government will not allow any discussion on this today in any world body, because it has the power to re-write the rules on decency. The reality though is that Americans are waking up to the true hate-mongering being practiced by the Federal and state governments in their name, and they want it to stop. The wholesale embezzlement of the nation's resources has more than one group in an uproar, but few understand the real extent of the stealing, as they are asked to support cuts in social programs that benefit people.

The bottom line is that the Federal republic cannot be salvaged. There is an open consensus that this is the case, but the media refuses to acknowledge this on the airwaves. The media is compromised and does not want to lose the protection of the republic's police. Yet there is no way to curb a system of government that employs approximately 22 million people. The republic is not the officeholders elected periodically; it is the bureaucracy that remains from year to year. Every effort to reform the bureaucracy is gutted by those very officials the reforms are designed to rein in, because the implementation of those reforms is left in their hands! They answer to no one, they can investigate anyone on any pretense, and there is no recourse anyone can turn to once a victim. Yet the government of a monarch governed by strict customs that date back to 1215 and 1689 is allegedly arbitrary!

Americans are at a disadvantage in regards to understanding the principles of law because the school system indoctrinates them with the idea that law is something that comes out of Congress. Real valid laws are those which derive of thousands of years of customs and precedents; the "laws" of Congress, on the other hand, are the conventions adopted by the politicians, which they must impose under their own authority using a police state, because they lack any real legal authority. This is because the legal system of government native to the American people -- monarchy -- had been overthrown by what were basically bandits, creating a vacuum of legitimacy known historically as an interregnum.

There are many people who ask why a monarchy is the only legal system of government, as if government can be devised by anyone in any arbitrary fashion individuals may desire. This is the most important point, because in 1776 the majority of the ordinary people supported the government of the king, not the revolutionaries. This was because for thousands of years the government of the king had been the legally constituted government that was the basis of order which they relied upon for their livelihoods.

The republic was designed to enrich the Founding Fathers at the expense of the American people. The American people in fact knew this, and were paranoid of the motives held by the aristocrats who pushed the radical agenda of revolution. The revolution was a form of mob violence that has divided American society TO THIS DAY! The agencies of the Federal Government were all designed with mobs in mind, using the psychology of mobs. It was a complete departure from legitimate representative government, making families like the Du Ponts among the wealthiest in the world. (Due to a friendship between the first du Pont and Thomas Jefferson, the House of Du Pont has supplied the United States Government with all its explosives in all of its wars since the War of 1812).

America is at a crossroads, however, because it has freed the slaves and admitted all the formerly indentured people of all races to citizenship, which the republic of the slavemasters is incapable of honoring. The law enforcement apparatus of the republic is dominated by an institutional memory of a bygone era when black people were slaves and loitering was "suspicious." The politicians hold the taxpayers in contempt, as they wait for the public to let its guard down long enough to pass legislation that openly steals the common heritage of the nation. And the American people are so confused by their "educations" that they cannot understand what is going wrong in their own native land.

The American Nation was deprived of legitimate government by the coup of the Founding Fathers, but this does not put the idea of a restoration of legitimate government outside of the realm of possibility. Should the people of our country recognize their birthright in the ancient kingdom, where their holy right to freedom had its origin, it is within their legal authority to act to reconstitute the legitimate institutions of government native to the ancient constitution. The way nations have acted in the past, they have made their will known through lawfully constituted parliaments, who thereby address the issues of the fundamental law of the society. This is the purpose of the American national Parliament, where every American national is obliged to be represented.

The Federal republic never catered to the national interest of the American people. It always catered to the interests of the most well-to-do, while assuming the pretense that the defense of the interests of the wealthy was the equivalent of the defense of the interests of the nation. This was well illustrated in an off the cuff statement of an executive of General Motors, who declared what's good for General Motors is good for America. Even more bluntly, a Vanderbilt once said, "The public be damned!"

Americans are not taught anything about the Federal Government because unlike the ancient government of England, the Federal Government is an actual institution that was initiated by a group of men at a particular place, on a particular day. The different organs of the British government came into being over a period of centuries as a result of need and custom. But the Congress, the Presidency and the Supreme Court were all created at one time by the enactment of the Constitution of 1787. This is extremely important because the faceless example of the republic became the proto-type for the corporation, the institution that lives forever while protecting its human beneficiaries from the legal consequences of their own actions.

The authors of the Constitution of 1787 were very shrewd, because they deliberately confused the institution they created -- the Federal Government -- with the American people. Casual readers are given the illusion that the Constitution is the body of law of the cultural nation; but anyone with even the slightest legal training can recognize that there are two entities addressed in the Constitution. Additionally, the Constitution of 1787 addresses black people as three-fifths of a person, which even today causes some concern among those who doubt the veracity of the Federal Government, when it comes to leading a free society.

When Dred Scott sued his master for his freedom, the courts of the United States declared that he had no recourse to the courts because black people -- free and slave -- were not citizens of the United States. The republic never really welcomed the black people, and even after the Civil War and the Emancipation of the slaves, they remained a separate ethnicity for a century until the civil rights movement enabled the black community to join the mainstream society. The republic is not the friend of the underclass. The political system of the republic is fundamentally based on inciting rivalries among the various ethnic groups that collectively make up the American people, so that the Federal Government can justify its existence as a "bridge," holding them together. The fact that it is planting the seeds of future conflict is deliberately ignored, especially by the pundits of the mass media.

The republic of the Founding Fathers is an anachronism, a product of an age when it was believed that machines were the answers to all of men's problems, and that the creation of a government that behaved like a machine was somehow more humane than a government of human beings. The fact that this mechanical system of government has inflicted more death and destruction than the hordes of Genghis Khan has gone happily unnoticed by the reporters and journalists.

The American Nation is the American people of all races and ethnicities, and they attain unity in the family of the Regent, the royal family of America. Through the royal family the American Nation is made into an extended family, and as in any family no individual is obliged to prove that he or she is an American national, or that he or she is entitled to all the customary rights and liberties of a national, because these are birthrights. Additionally, no one can "join" the nation: It is not an institution in the sense that there are membership requirements; Americans are automatically members of the American community, and they don't have to join anything to be entitled to their rights as Americans.

The Nation of America is the patriotic union of the whole people, and Americans are obliged to protect their interests as a nation by seeking the restoration of the ancient constitution in the United States. This entails discussing the issues of constitutional change openly, even though the leadership of the republic has suppressed the idea that change is even possible. It also entails participating in the election of a genuinely representative body that has the legal authority to restore the traditional institutions of the native law. This representative body is the American national Parliament.

The Nation of America is the whole American people, and the national Parliament is the way the whole people can express their will to restore the law. The convening of this Parliament is the core around which a new social movement is being created as the basis of a social union among the various American ethnic groups, that up until now have remained separate enclaves. This is an uncharted terrain, yet America now suffers under an on-going civil war that is devastating our inner cities and suburbs. The only way there will ever be a social peace is if the people of the communities, on their own initiative, seek a truce, which is being offered through the good offices of the Regent of the United States.

The reason the agencies of the republic cannot be involved in the restoration is the same reason that the Continental Congress under the Articles of Confederation could not be relied upon to make the call for a new Constitutional Convention: Under a new order, the old order would lose power. This self-centered viewpoint is now suffocating the United States, as all alternatives to the republic are killed at birth. Yet underlying it all is the basic reality that the republic was founded in defiance of the established and constituted legal authorities, which makes it de facto illegal, so that it is not within its authority to restore the law. All the republic can legally do is terminate its own existence by winding up its own affairs, and adopting a bill of dissolution.

The authority for the Parliament derives from the Nationalist Manifesto of the Regent of the United States, which will become the Charter of 1993 once a lawfully constituted Parliament has convened and adopted an Act Restoring the Crown of the United States. The Parliament is obliged to restore the constitutional monarchy, and set forth regulations for future elections to Parliament.

Once a Parliament is democratically elected, a government that would answer to this elected parliament would be asked to serve, and a president or prime minister of the new legal govenment of the restored American Kingdom would be inaugurated, finalizing the transition from a corrupt and collapsing republic to the most stable system of government ever known, constitutional monarchy.

The first priority of the Parliament must be to end the interregnum by restoring the ancient institution of the crown. The restoration of the crown represents a complete departure from the corrupt republic, in order to build a government that answers to the strict criteria of the ancient constitution. In order to lay the groundwork for a social truce, a national peace in America, it will be necessary to restore the integrity of the government. As long as the American masses distrust the state, the state will be unable to function.

The monarchy is by nature an impartial and national institution, which is predisposed to concern over long-term issues, like the quality of life of the people. The monarchy is not dominated by election cycles, which demand strident partisanship, and cynical machiavellian intrigue. As the constitutional head of state the monarch has a reserve of prerogatives, but these are always exercised in cooperation with the elected ministers, so that the full authority of the crown is in the hands of democratically elected officials. Some politicians like to think that a royal family and a monarch are superfluous; but America is the living evidence of what happens to a country when its full civilian authority is handed over to politicians. If there is no long-term interest in the state that rises above partisan politics, and which embodies the aspirations of ordinary people to be members of a national family, then there in fact is no true nation existent, for it takes more than politics to turn a people into a nation.

It is important for modern Americans to realize that the mythology of the republic is founded around a fraud, and it was only a matter of time before that fraud was exposed. The republic set up by the Founding Fathers was not set up to protect our rights, it was set up to protect THEIR rights. This is the most evident in the clause of the Constitution of 1787 reciting the qualifications men must meet to run for president. It is little known because it is deemed irrelevant to the living generation, but it was a loophole for all those people who wrote the Constitution of 1787, because it waived the rule that the president had to be native born exclusively for those people who were citizens at the time the Constitution was enacted.

Politicians rant and rave that America will only be saved by a balanced budget, or the construction of new prisons, but the reality is that at this time the various agencies of the Federal Government cannot be audited. This has been public knowledge for a few years now, after it was disclosed that the Pentagon was "not auditable," a fact that was also disclosed about the Internal Revenue Service. This raises the question, of course, of how the budget can be balanced when the Federal Government cannot account for the money it spends now. The biggest problem the American people face in the Federal republic is its lack of accountability.

The collapse of the republic is necessitating the evolution of a new state, and this is our opportunity to guarantee that the new state is actually constituted legally, so that it is responsive to the legal right of individuals to political freedom. We don't have to take any expert's advice, all we need to do is count on our own best instincts, to avoid the violent civil war that is now waging in our streets. The forces that are making war in America are clashing because there is no legitimate government in the country, which the belligerents trust enough to allow it to act as a mediator. Instead, the republic is the chief maker of that war, which is a war on the American people; a war that is resulting in the incarceration of tens of thousands of Americans, often for little more than violation of a vehicle code.

Peace must be the ultimate aim of all Americans, who must grow weary with the violence and demand in no uncertain terms that a responsible government assume the mantle of authority, for the retirement of a republic that is marked by its juvenile reactions to the consequences of its own legacy. The republic is dominated by its original fear of the poor, a trait invested in it by its founders, George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison. The entire scheme for the republic, with its state-like-provinces, was devised not to protect the government from some minority group attempting to take power, but by a "majority group." This majority, Madison argued in one of the Federalist Papers, would be separated by the existence of local states, so that any sentiment of dissent felt by a majority would be safely divided, and therefore something that could be managed and controlled.

The Founding Fathers spoke and wrote frankly about their dislike of democratic principles, and they regarded the subjugation of human beings through the institution of slavery as normal. The reason the historic record for the colonial period is dominated by the voices of plantation owners and men of means is because they held in servitude all those of the lower castes, and there were penalties for them if they voiced independent opinions. The state the Founding Fathers established was deliberately divided against itself so that it could not interfere in the affairs of the rich and powerful. The unprecedented creation of the three separate branches of government was then effectively passed off as an innovation for the benefit of the people, when in reality it always operated to the benefit of that class who were responsible for the enactment of the Constitution of 1787. We forget -- probably because we are not told -- that right before the United States Government was set up, that lots and lots of property had just changed hands, much of it through "extra-legal" means. Some of this land had been taken from the native Americans, who were disallowed all legal recourse because they were classified as foreign nationals, but much of it was the loot of the revolution. What our school teachers failed to tell us was that America at the time of the revolution was not a struggling group of colonies, scratching out a subsistence existence, but were instead prosperous communities that exported cash crops.

The United States Government was set up to establish legal title to properties that had been unlawfully taken, which meant that this property had to be secured by the coercive force of the Government's military and semi-military police power. The fact that the Government was erected to protect property that had been obtained by less than legal means, necessitated that the police state also had to become a prison state. The first "criminals" under this new regime, of course, were fugitive slaves seeking the freedom the republic supposedly guaranteed.

The state governments were junior partners in this arrangement, even though they originated as the senior partners. The reality, however, is that the states have no more abstract reality than the corporate institutions of the Federal Government, all of them being sustained by the common agreement of Americans that they exist, despite the fact that they are legal fictions governed by arcane rituals (like all corporations that have no existence in nature, but that only exist in the law). The Congress, the President and the Supreme Court are not organic creatures spawned by nature; they are instead agencies that only exist because we all agree that they exist, and under their influence we have been convinced that we cannot live without them.

The gruesome reality is that we cannot live with the republic. Its officials lie about its legacy, because it always sided with rich and powerful Americans against the poor and the weak Americans. The republic is dominated by the mindset and values of the slavemasters who founded it, even though they are dead and buried for two hundred years! The institutions of the republic were deliberately designed to avoid the checks and balances that existed in the ancient constitution, the constitution of the Mother Country. The men who designed the Federal Government, and who immediately set it up and then shaped its institutions, were determined to exercise the power that they thought they were entitled to as the masters of great estates worked by armies of slaves and servants. They never for a moment questioned the morality of servitude, and all rhetoric of freedom was directed to the propertied class of the white race, who were the only Americans entitled to vote in the early days of the republic. (Of course, this did not include white women, who were held in check by the same system of legalized domestic terrorism that was used to keep the multitudes of slaves from revolting and seeking freedom).

The institution of the republic was designed to secure certain title to stolen lands for those who acquired them prior to the establishment of the republic, which therefore cut off any avenues for recourse for those who were dispossessed. The state governments did this on a local level, actually playing a significant role in opening up the lands in the west, which originally consisted of the Ohio Valley. Chronologically, the Ohio Valley is the actual Old West, being the first area outside of the territory of the original thirteen states that would be assimilated by conquest, and the formation of territorial and state governments. This process led to spectacular abuses, such as the Oklahoma Land Rush (which inevitably enriched no one but the speculators), but it also laid out a pattern of colonization that seemed to legimitize the republic -- a bastard institution that could never overcome its lack of legitimacy because it was not a monarchy -- by entering into a partnership with poor landless white Americans, who became a new class of small freeholders, both dependent and grateful to the republic and its police for their new status as property owners. The only problem was that the property they were enjoying had been taken from its rightful owners, and the possibility always loomed that they might come back with the intention of reclaiming that which had been unlawfully taken away from them.

The new society of smallholders that took shape in the aftermath of the Revolution led to the evolution of an aberrant form of community that was the diametric opposite to the tribal society of the native Americans. The monarchy native to the European culture had more in common with the tribal ideal of chieftaincy, than the leader-centered presidency of the republic, which when shorn of its splendor was really just the senior policeman and jailer of the propertied class. In the end the republic just had no soul. It could take land and build big cities, but the people who came to live in these cities were predators and mercenaries. Loyalty came to be bought and sold as a quaint luxury, for the allegiance of the individual under the republic could be had for a price. Any pretense of nobility became a target of mockery because the fundamentals of civilization were turned on their head. The arrogant experiment with republicanism of the Founding Fathers started to spin out of control, but the riches that could be had were so great that no one with any prestige had an interest in sound principles or sound government.

Today we are living with the consequences of human subjugation in the past, even if we are not responsible individually for the actions undertaken in that previous period. This does not mean that we are obliged to assume responsibility for the heinous crimes that took place, but we do have to become reconciled with the reality of those crimes, and the fact that the consequences of those crimes has transcended time to be visited upon us. It is also essential that we come to recognize the fact that the republic was an active collaborator in most of those crimes, and that the perpetuation of the republic is one of the first obstacles to a social peace that has to be removed, if there is ever to be even a wisp of hope for the realization of a truce in the violent streets of America.

The leaders of the republic have put its legacy of slavery in the past, and its partisans insist on characterizing the republic as a reformed institution that is responsive to the demands of its citizens; but the unpleasant reality is that it meets all the demands of its citizens by investigating them as troublemakers. In the narrow mindset of the bureaucrats of the republic they have total power, and they genuinely believe that they are entitled to dispose of the citizenry any way they see fit. They have done this in the countless wars they have waged during this century by which they achieved global military supremacy; at the cost, however, of the lives of tens of millions of Americans. They have also done this in tests in which unwitting American nationals were used as guinea pigs, many of which resulted in the premature deaths of these people, depriving their loving families of their fathers, brothers and sons and mothers, sisters and daughters.

Yet if the dialogue is to touch upon the idea of the dissolution of the republic, it must also touch upon an alternative to the republic, because society is by no means at the stage whereby it can govern itself. The very existence of the republic -- wherein everything has a price -- has corrupted the soul of the American national, so that today pride of citizenship is not found in service to the nation, but in personal advancement. This has unleashed a predatory form of capitalism which could be called gangster capitalism, and it is typified by the rule of the so-called "drug barons" and their street gangs. Ironically, what feeds their control is the lucrative trade in illegal drugs and contraband, made lucrative by the Federal Government's prohibitions, which have done nothing but put a premium value on commodities that can be grown in any amateur's backyard, or manufactured in any bathroom by someone with a high school degree in chemistry.

The reality of the republic is that its business-centered orientation predisposed it to encourage competition even though the earliest colonists who settled in the Americas employed cooperation instead, when they built the first communities in the "New" World. Competition encouraged rivalries among the various ethnic groups that came to live in north America, which the Federal Government then made use of to appear above the fray as the arbiter between communities that not only never came together to form a genuine national union, but which the Federal and state governments did everything in their power to keep separated. The enticement of the acquisition of wealth has always been the main drawing card for the republic, which it became masterful at deploying in the aftermath of the Civil War, when the free labor of slaves was replaced by wage-labor, and a scrip form of currency was devised. The Federal Government developed the means to actually buy off the loyalty of the American population with currency it controlled the value of, but the final human being that became the end-product of the institutional power structure of the republic -- educated in its schools, employed in its corporations, and incarcerated in its prisons -- was a drug-addicted psychopath capable of going berserk without notice, and murdering innocent bystanders with no remorse.

The truth that many citizens do not want to face is that all the proof that has accumulated of Federal and state agencies that have blatantly broken laws, is hard evidence that the passing of new, harsher legislation is no answer. Why should people who have already broken the law shrink from breaking newer, stricter laws? The bureaucrats of the republic have already proven that they believe that they are above the law, and there is no reason for anyone to believe that under the current regime THAT ANYTHING OF SUBSTANCE WILL CHANGE. The protocols of the political parties have guaranteed that honest men and women cannot get elected to any positions of responsibility, and inevitably, honorable men are faced with the prospect of serving in a government that is out of control. Honorable and decent men who recognize the genuine danger the country is in, are forced to confront the fact that no position of authority under the republic has the legal power to put a stop to the abuses that now take place, and any attempt to do so could be fatal. The bottom line is that no responsible person would seek power under the Constitution of 1787, because the kind of power that is constituted under its auspices was deliberately made to afford powerbrokers illicit privileges, encouraging recklessness in the conduct of the business of the country that no decent person would be able to tolerate.

Once Americans begin educating themselves using information derived outside of the information cartels of big business, they will begin to become reconciled with the genuine characteristics of the Founding Fathers and their anachronistic slave-state, and the discussion of the ancient constitution will become inevitable. The American people, if they are nothing else, are a law-abiding people, and the great majority of Americans desire to live in communities that are, above all, governed by law. Once Americans give up the instant, canned version of life, wherein every major event is dominated by the unsolicited advice of government-licensed and accredited "experts," individuals will learn about the genuine responsibilities, risks and potentials involved in making their own decisions as free people. They will learn about the real nature of their ancient traditional rights and liberties, so that no fast-talking politician will ever be able to talk them out of them again. This is of the essence, for in the end the only effective tool against tyranny is not a weapon, but knowledge.

The institutions of constitutional government did not originate overnight, like the institutions of the republic. The institutions of the constitutional government evolved slowly over centuries to meet genuine needs, and along with them there evolved sensible solutions to the abuse of power, which are checks and balances that make a mockery of the supposed "checks and balances" of the republic. The abandonment of tried and tested governmental institutions by the Founding Fathers was by itself evidence that they wanted to control the executive office they invented, which was a blank slate on account of the fact that there were no precedents controlling or defining the office of the president, unlike the traditional executive, the monarch, which has been powerfully restrained by the Magna Carta of 1215, the Bill of Rights of 1689, and the Settlement Act of 1701 which established the constitutional principle of parliamentary supremacy. Under the rules of the constitutional monarchy even the king is bound to obey the law.

In the 1640s, at the beginning of the Civil War, one of the first concessions made by the king was the abolition of the Court of the Star Chamber, one of the most hated courts of all time. It is important for us to understand the significance of the abolition of the Court of the Star Chamber, because never in the history of the republic have its leaders acknowledged any wrong-doing by responding to public disgust with its agencies by abolishing them. The American people have, instead, suffered under the totalitarian regime of a national security state, which in effect suspended the normal rights of the American people. The U.S. Government has never admitted that it has ever done anything wrong. The alleged strength of international communism was used to justify the institution and perpetuation of a global American military establishment that came to possess an unprecedented accumulation of unilateral power, which when threatened by the truth that the Soviet Union was a second-rate military power on the verge of collapse, invented its own far more exciting form of "threat inflation," which characterized the obviously unstable and shoddy communist system as a shrewd ruse designed to camouflage its real power and evil intention to conquer the world. The fact that bureaucrats in the intelligence community even went so far as to give their "boss," the president of the United States, false and misleading information that encouraged the perpetuation of the Cold War -- in which millions of innocent Third World peasants lost their lives -- proves up ultimately that the bureaucracy has its own agenda, and the opposition of elected officials to this agenda is dealt with as nothing more than a temporary obstacle. Additionally, there is no moral compunction on the part of the bureaucrats of the republic, who feel free to take human life with the kind of abandon that was once thought of as the reserve of Nazi War Criminals. This is a real source of suffering for the common people, who are repeatedly the victims of the heartless and merciless practices of Federal and state programs and their administrators, which put the letter of the law above the humanity of the people.

The first truth Americans must face is the fact that the republic is not the best system of government in the world. Republics have historically been erected by businessmen who then use the power of the republic to create cartels. This predisposes them to oligarchical rule, which is the rule of a small exclusive class. The republic enables this exclusive ruling class to claim that the policies that are meant to benefit them, are in the patriotic interests of the whole country. The egalitarian propaganda of republics disguise the fact that underneath the calm surface there are always viscious disputes about whose plans will go forward, making all republics inherently, structurally unstable. Historically republics have a tendency to dissolve under pressure, laying the foundation for the restoration of the customary and traditional monarchy that lies at the center of the majority of the cultural traditions of the world.

When the first colonizers landed in north America they brought with them their undying allegiance to their king and country. This was not because the king was a tyrant, but because they had experienced the benefits of the monarchical constitution, and they sought to guarantee the protection of their traditional rights, which the proven stability of the monarchy ensured. School children are taught that they cannot "pick and choose" what laws they will obey, yet the Founding Fathers did just that when they sought to discontinue the monarchy in favor of an experimental presidency (which ironically became the model for the modern dictator of a fascist state). The monarchy brought moral and spiritual sanctity to the state, which even the most jaded princes sought to preserve, even if their judgment was clouded by self-interest. What most modern people don't understand, largely because they interpret institutions of the past using assumptions derived from modern experiences, is that ancient kings did not spend most of their time issuing orders. Modern presidents, as executive officers of the state, spend a great deal of time pondering the issuance of all kinds of executive orders and decrees, in all the advanced countries of the industrial world; but ancient kings, to the contrary, spent the greater proportion of their time moving around their kingdoms hearing lawsuits brought by their subjects, in order to dispense justice.

Monarchy ultimately cannot be defined as "just another political system." That is the big lie of the partisans of the republic, because when the republic is stripped of all rhetoric, it indeed IS nothing more than a political machine. Monarchy, on the other hand, evolved from the ancient and timeless principles of chieftaincy, which were derivative of the institution of parenthood, and the natural deference even grown children demonstrate for their parents and elders. All aboriginal cultures have taboos that oblige the society to show respect for its elders, the oldest of which usually form a council of elders, which became the basis of terms like "senate," originally a body of elders. The longevity of senior members of the tribe is considered to be a source of wisdom available to the whole tribe, which is deemed to be an asset that must be valued and protected. Unlike the broken down society of the republic wherein senior citizens are bundled off to die in "senior ghettos," where they can have no troublesome influence on their families by introducing them to traditional ideas or practices, the elders of aboriginal tribes are deeply respected as the repositories of the tribe's history, and therefore they are viewed as the guardians of the tribe's identity. This is relevant to modern society because by confining senior citizens, and isolating them from their families, the natural process whereby a society passes on its values and identity from one generation to the next is shortcircuited, and the young are left to their own devices. In such a state, left without the guidance of the loving hand of those they can trust -- the elders of their own flesh and blood -- the youth soon feel abandoned, and with the impulsive nature of children, and the misinformation fed to them by the institutions of the republic, they act out in ways that they hope will gain them attention, even if that attention is punitive in nature. What is not readily recognized by all the experts on gang violence is the fact that street gangs have come to serve the role of surrogate families for children whose families have become the casualties of the republic's efforts to hijack the authority of families by discrediting them. Ultimately, a gang is the kind of community a child might set up without the guidance of adults, who are often too busy fulfilling their duties as wage-earners in a rigged economy to fulfill the traditional role of parent to their own offspring.

The monarchist restoration in the United States embodies the ancient legal principle that American nationals are entitled to pursue their own purposes. That is what genuine political freedom is all about. The retirement and dissolution of the republic and the restoration of the American Kingdom is a clarion call to the individual to throw off the chains of low self-esteem that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness that were designed to function as psychological warfare -- deployed by the republic -- to interfere with the natural tendencies of the individual to defend himself. People with low self-esteem will not defend themselves, thus self-confidence causes alarm to the minions of the republic because it can lead to such things as the individual disregarding the advice of accredited, professional "experts," in favor of the advice of a loved one, or someone else who may actually have the interests of the individual at heart. The republic has spawned the ideology of a false "equality," which is not the belief that all people are equal before the law, but which instead props up a deadly belief that regardless of how ignorant anyone might be, no one is obliged to pay heed to anyone else, no matter how wise they may be. This twisted form of "equality" is complemented by the "rules" of modern life that "oblige" the individual to put him or herself at the disposal of "experts" licensed by the republic, which guarantees that no expert will set himself up as an independent authority, unconnected to the whole system of official pressure that ensures that whatever advice the "expert" dispenses will be in the best interests of the republic, regardless of the needs of people.

While the restoration of the ancient constitution, and the constitutional institutions of government, will create a basis for the salvaging of the American society, it must be understood that individuals cannot stand by the sidelines, expecting the benefits of a friendly society to just fall on them by the force of gravity. The truth is that individuals have to become genuinely excited by the prospects of being free, and they must find the inner motivation to pursue the changes that will make the restoration of the law possible. Individuals will be called upon to rise above their natural shyness, to reach out to their contemporaries, the people they share their lives with by the simple coincidence that they are alive at the same time. Life ultimately is a blessing -- a gift from God -- and it is to the shame of the individual if he or she is unable to properly take advantage of their own existence by sharing it with others. All organic life is governed by the laws of the universe, which means that mortal existence is finite. Like all living things, there is a season for being born, for growing up, for maturing, and for dying. No one escapes this circle, and it is for this reason that God gave us the most wonderful gift of all, the capacity to feel love for another human being. It is love that binds families and nations into whole clothe, that even the most powerful fires of hell cannot put asunder. Likewise it is for love, and out of love, that the individual makes the greatest sacrifices, sacrifices that enlarge the individual, who instead of being diminished by the act of sacrifice is instead unified with that for which the sacrifice is made, so that in the end the individual who makes a sacrifice out of love is enhanced and enriched in terms of the experience of life and the sense of purpose.

The republic's emphasis on what the individual can take and possess, fortified by the glorification of possessions by the glamorization of the lifestyles of the ultra-rich, neglects the impact selfishness has on the soul. The selfish individual is unappealing to others; he will burn bridges with insults and infamy, feeling that if he does not take care of Number One, he will ultimately end up out in the cold, with nothing. The reality that no one is an island, and that trust in others can pay off so long as a measure of discretion is employed in choosing one's friends and allies, is not readily apparent due to the steady campaign of fear and doubt that are drummed into the minds of individuals, largely through the mass media and the curriculum of the educational institutions of the republic. If fear of failure does not persuade the individual to distrust his fellow countrymen, then fear of being a victim will suffice, for fear and doubt are imperfect commodities that are usually given that finishing touch by the addition of the individual's own secret, private fears -- virtually ghosts that haunt us -- which can be invoked by the mere suggestion that if the individual does not pursue his own advantage, even if it hurts others, that he might become the victim of someone else who is, indeed, taking care of himself first. Of course, this works to the benefit of the republic, for when it injures someone unjustly the population will be so absorbed in the pursuit of private pleasures that no one will lift a finger to protect the principle of justice that protects the political freedom of the whole nation.

The restoration of the ancient constitution entails Americans recognizing that this is one of the most exciting episodes for this nation, and that this is an opportunity for us to leave our own individual imprints on history. The whole country has to become involved in the convening of the national American Parliament, because it will become the focus of one of the most exciting public discussions of our time. Unlike the pre-planned official ceremonies of the republic that are stage-managed in order to cut out spontaneity, and which therefore reduce the possibility that someone might make a mistake and actually express freely what is on his mind, the national Parliament will come together for the purpose of drawing upon the collective opinions and experience of Americans motivated enough to participate.

The role of the national Parliament is to put an end to the interregnum by enthroning a monarch to succeed the last American monarch, who was deposed unlawfully by the usurpation of the republic in 1776. By this one simple act the government of the United States will be made legitimate. A source of valid law shall be restored -- consistent with customary and traditional law -- which will make it possible for the election of a democratically-elected prime minister or president to run the government. This is vital because it addresses the root issues of legitimacy in the government, and only the total and complete replacement of the corrupt and collapsing republic by a government shaped by the conventions of the ancient constitution will have the vitality or integrity to carry out the changes that are necessary to save America from extinction.

What is not being openly addressed today is the fact that there are now open insurgencies being carried out against the republic in most of the fifty states of the country. Many of these insurgencies are being carried out by militias organized by the people themselves, based on what knowledge they have scraped together on the ancient common law. Unfortunately, if these insurgencies succeed, the inevitable outcome shall be the complete collapse of the American Nation. This is because the loyalty of these militias is not dedicated to the nationwide ideal of a united America, but is instead focused on local identities, such as the state or the county. Additionally, another force pulling the American Nation apart are the street gangs, with their emphasis on the control of neighborhoods and streets using violence that the police are virtually helpless in the face of. The gangs and the militias are constantly at work consolidating their hold on localities, and should the will of the national government ever fail, these local groups will have nothing opposing their efforts to seize power locally. The tragic reality underlying these trends is that history is on their side, because whenever an organism such as a nation has forces pulling it apart, it is just a matter of time before the center cannot hold, and the forces of nature -- and the jungle -- take their toll. This does not mean, however, that all is lost. It does mean that we must come to grips with the truth that the republic has lost the loyalty of the American people as a result of the willingness of its politicians to act in bad faith, by making promises they have no intention of keeping, and that a new government with integrity is called for. It means that Americans must recognize, as individuals, that they have to stop confusing their own interests with the interests of the republic. And it means that if Americans do not decisively CHOOSE to keep America a united, single nation, the likelihood increases a thousandfold that America -- our native country -- will cease to exist.

The choice is ours to make. The politicians in their capitals are presiding over moribund institutions, which they realize, and which has made them desperate with fear. This is why the American Kingdom cannot threaten them, or imply that some kind of punishment will be inflicted upon them should they surrender and pass a bill of dissolution finalizing the transition to the ancient Kingdom that is our patrimony. The truth is that the politicians stand to gain as much from the restoration of law as any other American, and it would be imprudent to demonize people who are as concerned as the next person about the quality of life in their homeland. This is why the Regent is offering the politicians and employees of the republic a general amnesty (except for high treason, proved in court).

It should be clear that the ideal of restoring the integrity of government does not necessarily mean invoking a violent retribution or revenge, because it would set the whole process back if the new government were to start its reign with a bloodbath. Additionally, the ideal of a united country would be delayed if it had to wait for the outcome of a civil war, because the mortal hatred that comes from the atrocities of war would probably seal the doom of this country. Therefore, the only alternative besides the continuation of the corrupt republic, involves the peaceful assembly of the American people, to restore by their own authority the ancient constitution by meeting in a national Parliament, pursuant to law, to enact an Act Restoring the Crown of the United States. Through dedication to this one ideal, the rebirth of the American Nation as a true nation, the American people will stand a chance of saving their homeland from the destruction of the extremism of the republic, as well as open up countless opportunities for the replenishment of our culture through the liberation of the individual.

1. The biggest obstacle to the restoration of the ancient constitution is the ignorance of the American people about the existence of the ancient constitution. This can be remedied by simply talking about it openly, even if the reactions to the idea are negative. Initially most Americans will experience a little shock at the idea of an original constitution because it is an unfamiliar idea, but once the exotic and controversial subject is broached it will be just a matter of time before the topic of the existence of the ancient constitution will become too inviting to ignore.

2. The fact that the executive native to the ancient constitution is a monarch will take most semi-literate, and even college-educated Americans by surprise, and many of them will have an immediate reaction mocking the idea, and especially the principle that monarchy is the only legal system of government. This is largely due to the plan of the Founding Fathers for preventing the possibility of a restoration by encouraging Americans to despise monarchy, using fictional and exaggerated events to inspire actual hatred in them against it. For example, in the Declaration of Independence a whole list of grievances is laid at the feet of the last American king, George III, which he was actually not responsible for. The king was a constitutional king, and those parties responsible for the grievances were the elected politicians in the ministries who ran the Government. It is vital to the welfare of the American Nation that Americans become educated as to the true motivations of the Founding Fathers when they slandered the lawful king, and substituted a new experimental executive in the place of the monarch, which had no restrictions placed on it by custom or law, so that the Founding Fathers could control it for their own benefit. While it is unnecessary to defend King George III -- because the revolution is history -- it is important that educated Americans defend the institution of the monarchy, because it is the long-term interest in the state that exists by virtue of the monarch which guarantees that the government will not be moved by short-term considerations to deprive the people of their traditional rights and liberties guaranteed to them in the ancient constitution.

3. A significant obstacle to the restoration is the widespread notion that the "Bill of Rights" to the Constitution of 1787, is the source of the civil rights of Americans. This is not only a false notion but a dangerous idea that could undermine the actual freedom of the American Nation. The truth is that the legal rights of Americans to political freedom derive from the principles of law and conventions and statutes of the ancient unwritten constitution, which is not only the basis of the civil rights of the people but of the entire legal system in force in the United States today. The real basis of law is not the legislation of Congress, but the practices of the people themselves which we call "custom." Those customs that have been upheld by magistrates in court as valid have come to be known as the "common law," some of which is written, but most of which is contained in principles which have been clarified and refined for thousands of years by scholars called jurists. It is important for all Americans to understand that their rights do not derive from the republic. Instead the legal rights of all American nationals derive from the Magna Carta of 1215, as well as multitudes of customs, conventions and statutes that pre-date the "Bill of Rights" by close to a thousand years. These rights devolve upon every generation as hereditary rights that are inalienable. It was because these legal rights were so firmly established that the Founding Fathers made the Federal Government so powerful, because they knew that it would be up against the people, who realized that they were entitled to "rights." The reason it is dangerous to attribute the freedom of the American people to the "Bill of Rights" comes down to the fact that if the people can be convinced that the only source of their legal rights is the "Bill of Rights," it suggests that the American people received some kind of gift for which they should be grateful. This has the end effect of converting the ancient hereditary right of the people to freedom, into a privilege granted by the republic, which the politicians feel that they are entitled to withhold any time someone refuses to acknowledge their authority.

4. Finally, individuals have to take the initiative to convene the American national Parliament. The monarchy has only been provisionally restored by the institution of the traditional Nation of America. This has established the social basis of the monarchy under the Regency of the United States. The Regency is a transition institution that is making it possible for the American Crown to be restored, while in the meantime it acknowledges the fact that the republic is the current government. The Cry of Stillwater Bay (11 April, 1993) proclaimed the intent of the Regent to restore the American Throne legally, to lay a foundation for a legitimate representative government. The process of electing delegates to the Parliament is the means by which the supporters of the Kingdom will actively start a popular movement for the restoration, and the public coronation of the Regent as the lawful King of the United States will be the culmination of that popular movement. Once the monarchy has the popular support of the American people the Regency will be terminated in favor of the full regnal office of king, whose duly elected ministers will spearhead a General Strike aimed at convincing the partisans of the republic that it no longer has the support of the American people, and that it should wind up its affairs and enact a bill of dissolution.