|
American Nation?
The American nation is constituted of the people of America.
The nation exists separate and distinct from the American government,
because the nation is the human society that exists in America.
The government is the state, it is a tangible institution, whereas
the society is an intangible concept that is carried in the heart
of every patriotic American national. The idea of the nation
is an entirely neutral idea. There is no obligation on anyone
that insinuates that to have patriotic loyalty towards one's own
homeland, or adopted homeland, one must necessarily take a position
against the nation of any other people. Every individual is entitled
to a nationality, which entitles that individual to participate
in a national community, to which he or she is tied by tradition,
customs, inheritance, or free choice.
The American nation came into existence almost by accident, because
it was not the intention of the founding fathers to create a nation
that would embrace all the people of the Americas. The republic
the founding fathers set up directly addressed the chief concerns
of the founders - the majority of whom were plantation-owning
slavemasters - which was a police state to guard their possessions.
Anyone who is the least bit aware of the genuine historic record
knows that none of the men who wrote the Constitution of 1787
had any intention of introducing any democratic influence into
their caste system. They were all openly hostile
to democracy. Most ironically, of course, is that at the time
of the Revolution, the term "American" had no importance
aside from being a geographical expression. This is because the
majority of the European people living in the colonies at the
time of the Revolution still thought of themselves as Englishmen
who lived overseas.
The republic devised by the founding fathers was not designed
to give freedom, but to narrow it down and control it. The most
compelling evidence of this was their effort to replace customary
rights and liberties that Americans enjoyed under the ancient
constitution of the American kingdom, into privileges "allowed"
the people under the so-called "Bill of Rights." Rights
to freedom are inalienable and immutable, and they are inherited
by the community as a folkright, (however, they apply to individuals,
for the community only has existence in the form of individuals).
But when the lawyers of the republic claim that all civil rights
derive of the Constitution of 1787, and the first ten amendments,
called the "Bill of Rights," they are, in effect, divesting
individuals of their traditional rights, to vest them in legislators.
The very notion that a right is inalienable suggests that no
LEGAL government can revoke it without due process of law. The
republic has nullified this right to due process by redefining
governmental authority in a way that favors the powerful, the
oligarchy of the richest families in the republic, to the detriment
of the average American. Of course, this is not what American
children are taught in school.
When the Federal Government was faced with deciding the intentions
of the founding fathers with regards to the descendants of Africans
in America, the Supreme Court handed the country the Dred Scott
decision, which declared that no black person, slave or free,
was entitled to the protection of the law as a human being, because
the intentions of the founders was to exclude them from national
participation. The black people in America, like the Jews, are
always alert to white prejudice against them, because historically,
even though tolerance may be the order of the day, spontaneous
outbursts of racism and bigotry have taken place without warning.
There is always a wariness to let down their guard, because even
though faced with smiles, there are also the jokes that are spoken
under breath that reveal the same racism that the republic was
founded upon. This is not only true for blacks and Jews, but
also Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans, native Americans, and
all other ethnic minorities.
Racism is a holdover from the colonial period. The United States
had its origins as a colonial venture, and the first investors
in the New World were worried that their interests might not be
tended to with the same enthusiasm by slaves, or native workforces.
In north America the Europeans found that the native Americans
were poor slaves, because they either got depressed and died,
or they committed suicide. Thus there developed a market for
the importation of slaves from Africa, who worked vast plantations
not only in north America, but throughout central and south America,
and the Caribbean. Upon the backs of these slaves vast European
fortunes were founded. Which, of course, needed tending to by
Europeans, who could be convinced that their real interests were
in Europe, not the colonies.
Europe at the time of the migrations to the New World was a closed
society. As a medieval society land was vested in the oldest
son, and younger sons found themselves essentially landless, which
meant poor. Of course, the younger sons of an Earl or a Duke
felt that they were entitled to privileged treatment, and these
were always the first people to offer to go on crusade, because
it opened the possibility that the younger sons might be able
to establish themselves independently by acquiring property.
When this medieval drive could no longer be directed at the Middle
East and Palestine, it was natural for it to be directed towards
the New World, where the crusade-speak of "saving the souls"
of the natives of the Americas, took the place of "saving"
the infidels of Palestine.
Very often younger sons of the nobility were assigned duties such
as governor of a colony in the Americas, or supervisor of plantations
owned by absentee owners residing in Europe. The real goal of
these men, however, was to gain a fortune in the New World, in
order to return to the Old World to live in splendor; all real
status still existing in Europe. Thus was born the warped ideology
of racial solidarity, which was an entirely colonial invention
meant to drive a wedge between persons of European stock, and
persons of black, Asian, or Indian descent. What really wedged
the notion of racial solidarity into the colonies, however, was
the tension between the slavemasters and the slaves. The slaves
were constantly looking for ways to escape, and the overseers
of the plantations had a financial interest in not allowing these
escapes to take place. While this sounds like a fairly routine
policing job, it was in actuality the source of pitched battles
all through-out the era of slavery, in which the dividing lines
became entrenched after both sides committed various atrocities,
and racial solidarity gave way to racial distrust, and ultimately,
to race-based hatred. The genuine characteristics of life in
America at the time of the Revolution was not any kind of patriotic
zeal, but instead the society was permeated with a dread of slave
revolts, that was accentuated when the British went so far as
to free the slaves in the colonies, realizing that every Revolutionary
leader was being served by slaves in his most intimate quarters.
This is the part of the story that never makes it into history
books in public schools in America.
The younger sons of European nobility found that they could easily
win lands much vaster than their older brothers possessed back
in Europe, and in several generations they made up the majority
of the elite of the colonies, running things behind the scenes
as the major landowners. The only problem was that they needed
people they felt that they could trust, to run their properties.
This resulted in an influx of white lower-class Europeans as
indentured servants, largely from Ireland, Scotland and the area
that later became Germany. These poor white people served two
purposes, one purpose was that they served as overseers of slaves
on the basis of racial solidarity, (and to further indulge that
illusion, they were given token "privileges" that made
them feel superior to their non-white workforces). The second
purpose they filled was to serve as buffers on the frontier against
hostile natives, protecting the established elites on the East
Coast, who offered them "free land" if they would settle
it. Of course, this meant trespassing over boundaries that had
been set up to protect the native Americans, the aboriginal people,
which the treaty signatories never intended to observe.
The history of the European subjugation of the native Americans
was the example cited by Adolf Hitler, when he was questioned
as to how a population as small as Germany's could rule the world.
Another example he quoted was the subjugation of the Indian sub-continent
by Great Britain, whereby several hundred thousand civil servants
ruled a country of (at the time) four hundred million natives.
This is uncomfortable for Americans to face, however, the model
for the "removal" of the native Americans was the model
followed by the Germans in the Second World War, when they conquered
Poland and the Ukraine, and began killing people, even copying
the American example right down to deporting the undesirables
to concentration camps using railroad cars. Americans will often
reject this comparison, because to the naked eye the 11 million
people killed by the Nazis during their 12 year reign seems incomparable
to the removal of the native Americans over a 300 year period.
But estimates regarding the native population of America at the
time of the first European landings in the New World range from
5 million to 50 million, and today, in the United States, less
than a million native Americans are left. In places like California,
less than a century ago the State of California offered to pay
a bounty for Indian scalps.
American society, up until fairly recently, was a white European
society. This society was influenced by the sub-cultures of the
black community, and the Hispanic community, and the native American
community, and the Asian community. But there was also a tension
to keep the domination of the state in the hands of white people,
up until the 1960s. There were, of course, individual blacks,
Hispanics, Indians and Asians who achieved some prominence despite
the racist nature of American society, but these were limited
by subtle racism that even dominated the mindset of the Abolitionists,
who fought so valiantly to end slavery in the United States.
The Abolitionist leaders were almost all white, and male, something
that Frederick Douglass complained about openly.
Long before the Civil Rights laws of the 1960s the republic had
developed a means for controlling the population, through what
some activists referred to as "wage slavery." The Master
and Servant Laws, later called the Labor Codes, openly sided with
the employers, who initially not only employed people, but controlled
their conduct through company towns, or policies that forced employees
to give their bosses consent to intervene in their private lives.
Henry Ford was notorious for his spy network that kept tabs on
his workforce. Henry Ford, the open supporter of Adolf Hitler,
whose plants continued to build products in Germany despite the
fact that the United States was at war with Germany.
When company towns fell out of favor, around 1913, the Federal
Reserve System was set up, creating a nationalized system of currency
and banks that formed the second half of the pincer that employers
put on their employees, namely credit. In the 1920s consumer
credit was invented, so that employees now had a rock-solid bond
compelling them to accept bad treatment by unfair employers, because
they had debts they had to pay. Nothing de-radicalizes someone
faster than giving him something he can call his own, which he
has to pay for, but which he has no money to pay for it with.
By lending Americans money at lucrative interest rates, the average
man could be tied to a job for the majority of his natural life.
After debt, the best means of controlling people is to give them
a "college education." It is not very apparent how
illiterate many of the Ph.Ds in the U.S. actually are, but the
fact is that what a college education endows the individual with
is the ability to always think INSIDE THE BOX. Degree wielding
post graduate students have an uncanny ability to predict how
bureaucracies will respond to various proposals, and their naked
ambition almost always impels them to cater and pander to the
interests of the bureaucracy. Of course, this is not true of
every person who holds a college degree, but it is certainly true
of the great majority, who don't even aspire to achieve any distinction.
The hospitals and court rooms of America are swollen with mediocrities,
who only went on to their chosen professional careers because
of the promise of fat paychecks, not any particular appreciation
of the healing arts, or the practice of law.
America today is a divided nation, a nation that has been formed
by two centuries of struggles. Struggles that the republic responded
to first by sending out the police, and second, by giving minorities
the vote, and civil rights. The fact, however, is that the republic
is more comfortable sending out the police; that is what the founding
fathers intended. Concessions to the underclass - racial, economic
and social - were done not out of any charitable spirit, but out
of the dread that the underclass will demand the dissolution of
the republic, the historic instrument of their suppression. While
the country smolders with discontent, the republic has virtually
doubled its number of police and prisons. The rhetoric of the
politicians of the republic is freedom and justice, but the actions
of the politicians is to aggravate the social situation by sleazy
deals that outright sell out the American national interest.
Yet the American Nation exists despite the best efforts of the
republic to suppress the aspirations of Americans. The politics
of the republic seed the population with racist innuendoes that
various ethnic groups are getting more of the wealth of the nation
than other ethnic groups, while the real wealth is sold out the
back door to multi-national corporations. The front that the
politicians let the people see is "The Honorable Senator,"
and "The Honorable Congressman," but the reality is
that the pecking order in Congress is tightly controlled by partisan
fixtures, that make real justice completely impossible. Americans
are never taught that their nation is being subverted by the republic.
They are never taught that the republic was invented by the founding
fathers out of thin air, and was an outright experiment at the
time it was imposed. An invention that could never be legal,
or constitutional as that term had been understood prior to 1776.
The American Nation today exists only in a nebulous form. The
core of this nation is an Anglo-Saxon traditional society, based
on thousands of years of northern European customs and traditions.
However, subsequent to the evolution of this Anglo-American society,
there also evolved African Americans, Asian Americans, Native
Americans, and Hispanic Americans, each group going through decades
of ordeals that basically cemented their entitlement to American
Nationality through good old blood, sweat and tears. The only
problem is that there are no traditional institutions to give
fruition to the drive of these various ethnic communities, to
become a single genuine nation. The President of the republic
strives to fill this role, but in fact he is more feared than
respected, being the chief jailer of Americans of all ethnic backgrounds.
The traditional institution that has provided for cultural union
in the past, that is native to the constitutional law of the Anglo-American
society - regardless of the protests of political junkies - is
the monarchy. It was the Crown that unified the Angles, the Saxons,
the Jutes and the Danes into a single English people, and it is
the Crown of America that will bind together all the ethnic groups
of the United States into a single American people.
The traditional institution that has served the purpose of representing
that traditional nation, for over a thousand years,
is the parliament. The fact that the republic was designed to
subvert the constitutional protections the monarchy offers the
people can be readily discovered in the Constitution of the republic,
which originally only allowed property owners to vote, and thereby
to be represented in the Congress. This always skewed the legislation
of Congress in the favor of the propertied class, at the expense
of the property-less class. On the other hand, in the parliaments
sanctioned by ancient traditions the propertied are represented
in the House of Lords, while the lower orders were represented
in the House of Commons.
America has suffered under the burden of the police state of the
republic. Her people have toiled with no reward, as her virgin
forests have been reduced to wastelands. The great wealth of
America has been squandered by the corruption of a republic that
is masked from the American people by a mythology that has changed
slavemasters into folk heroes! Even as the crime rate goes down,
the politicians of the republic build new prisons and hire more
police. The hatred of the Revolution - the first civil
war in America - has been perpetuated into our own time
by the republic, the institution of the slavemasters. Race war,
class war, these are the drives of the republican order of government,
which is never moved unless a million people descend upon the
Capitol.
The republic is a government of crisis and intervention. The
rights of individuals must always yield in the face of the institutions
of the republic, for the Constitution of the republic subverts
the ancient protections of the law. Thus while natural Americans
sank into the depths of indentured servitude under the auspices
of the republic, legal corporate persons, or corporations, came
into their own as the climax of the Revolutionary era, after which
it became important to hide the face of the slavemasters who own
the country. The American Nation, the American people, never
have influence on the policies of the republic because the corporations
of America are the only agencies with any clout, capable of expressions
of power over the Federal Government.
The republic, however, is powerless in the face of the human heart:
it can only hold onto power over the American people so long as
Americans believe in it. But as the republic grew conceited in
its sense of unchallengeable power, it failed to observe fine
lines, that it crossed, much to the resentment of vast numbers
of people, so that today the most widespread sentiment from Cape
Cod to San Diego, and from New Orleans to Seattle, is distrust
of the authority of the republic. Many millions of Americans
recognize that the Federal Government is an institution that is
out of control, like a run-away freight train. Even gas station
attendants recognize that at some point, every run-away freight
train must wreck.
Cynicism in America is knee-deep, because while average people
realize that corruption is the real weakness undermining the effectiveness
of the government, they also see no way out. Like rats caught
in a maze, the republic is a house of mirrors, and no one can
find the opening that leads to freedom. The logic of the republic
is a self-justifying circle, which begins and ends with the republic.
To think outside of this circle is to invite social banishment,
which has been the socially acceptable means for ostracizing individuals
who refuse to accept the legitimacy of the republic. The schools
teach acceptance of the republic, the media preaches the gospel
of the republic, and the police uphold the republic, and anyone
who defies this iron triangle winds up unemployed, or in prison.
The traditional American Nation exists outside of
the institutional infrastructure of the republic. The nation
is constituted of the American people wherever they may be, penthouse
or poor house. The traditional nation is constructed OF traditions,
by the authority of tradition. This transcends any coercive power
of the republic, and speaks directly to the intangible allegiance
people have for their homeland, the love that swells up spontaneously
in their bosom. Unlike the republic, which came into existence
like a corporation, on a particular day when men signed a legal
document, the traditional nation only has existence as a result
of the aspiration of Americans towards nationhood. When the republic
falls, the Nation of America will continue
to live.
The living American Nation has its origins in a tradition that
can be related by word of mouth, because it was instituted by
an act of will instead of by a legal document. After working
with the poor and homeless for several years, and observing the
pain of the American people at the hands of the republic, the
chief of Ely-Chaitlin, an American prince, uttered the Cry
of Stillwater Bay on 11 April, 1993. Stillwater Bay is
the traditional name for Capistrano Bay, in south Orange County,
California. By this Cry the chief inaugurated the American Nation,
and as chief of the Americans he provided a traditional focal
point for the loyalty of the people in the formation of an authentic
American national society. On 2 January, 1994, the chieftaincy
of the American Nation became the Regency of the United States,
when the chief assumed the style of Regent of the United States.
The main priority of the Regency is the establishment of a national
parliament to enable the American people to have a national dialogue.
The formation of a genuine nation shall depend heavily upon the
reconciliation of the various American ethnic groups, which can
only happen through the evolution of a real dialogue between them.
This can never happen through Congress, which disallows the various
parts to combine because of its structure and functions. The
system of representation of the Congress is so rigidified, that
no one can be elected who has not sold out his interests in favor
of those who can afford to finance a political campaign. Only
a traditional national parliament has the capacity to address
the real concerns of the country, so as to bring about the renaissance
of a true American nation.
The ultimate purpose of the nation is to bring out the best
in the American people. This cannot happen under the auspices
of a police-state republic, which suspects the worst of people.
The founding premise of the republic as a police state is that
people are bad, and that the only thing that keeps them in check
is fear of punishment. The truth, that the American people are
a good, honest, decent and law-abiding people, can only come to
fruition under the laws of the ancient constitution, through the
restoration of the ancient American kingdom.
When the President of the United States is inaugurated, he must
swear an oath to "protect and defend the Constitution against
all enemies, foreign and domestic." This indicates that
the founding fathers recognized that they were setting a war into
motion against all those Americans who did not believe in the
republic, the "domestic enemies" of the Constitution
of 1787. Like the Revolution itself, the republic set up Americans
in opposition to other Americans, as enemies. And it is the legacy
of that war that we feel every day in the general disorder that
envelopes us all. The goodwill and goodfaith of the government
is gone, vanished, through two centuries of penalization and punishment.
Now the opportunity is before us to re-invent America as a real
nation, under the traditional chieftaincy of the monarchy, through
the restoration of the Crown in the United States.
The Crown does not favor one political party above the other.
The Crown is the embodiment of the whole united nation, outside
of ethnic divisions, as a human community. The oath of the monarch
does not compel him to support any faction, instead, the oath
of the king is to protect and defend the entire nation, and politics
is left in the hands of politicians who answer to a democratic
electorate. The failure of the Presidency can be found in a lineage
of men so crass, that when the most recent occupant of the office
was found to be a liar, his defenders countered that this was
a trait common to all the Presidents of the United States.
If Americans do nothing, they will leave the fate of their nation
by default, in the hands of Congress, and political parties so
corrupt that the nation is their hostage. Only by the restoration
of traditional, constitutional institutions, will it be possible
for the United States to continue to exist. Deals cut in Congress
are arcane, massive transactions that transfer the bulk of the
country's wealth to private interests, all of which became the
beneficiaries of such munificence because of their political affiliations
with the politicians who run the Congress. Real people can petition
their senators and congressmen until they are blue in the face,
because if they cannot come up with a significant political contribution
at campaign time, their letters, faxes and email are so much compost
in a landfill. Americans are already so disenchanted with the
republic, that the media is paranoid about giving any news coverage
to the restoration movement in the United States. Americans must now take it upon themselves as individuals to take part in the formation of the American Nation, by participating in the formation of a national American parliament. Parliament means "meeting," for it is in parliament that the people begin to communicate with each other. It is the meeting-table where the real work can begin ironing out the feelings that exist in all Americans about the failure of the government. Only honesty can redeem us. Only the truth about our past will free us. And the only way to guarantee that freedom is by the restoration of the ancient constitution that recognizes that freedom is a birthright. |
RETURN TO ARCHIVE
|