As the arguments continue as to whether or not public schools fulfill their functions, or whether taxes should be raised, or how much the deficit should be, no one gives even the slightest attention to the nature of the institution they are dealing with: THE GOVERNMENT.

Even though we are all brought up with the belief that government is a trust, we are in for a shock when we try to find any legal evidence of such a trust’s existence. Strictly speaking, the government is not a trust, and its members are not public representatives or agents. Above all of the protests of positive law attorneys, the Law is based on custom as well as statute, and it is very strict in its definition of agency, and the rules regarding the conveyance of authority. In order to prove this point, we shall first examine the U.S. Constitution.

The Constitution is not a contract because there are not two or more parties who, at the time of its adoption, covenanted to be bound by it, as evidenced by signatures. Furthermore, those people who adopted it had no legal authority to do so, nor to impose it upon other people, neither from their mandate as an assembly nor from any persons who may have made them their delegates.

There is not one power of attorney or appointment of any kind attached to the Constitution; thus the men who drew up the document are the only ones bound by it, and unfortunately they are all dead today, so we cannot hold them accountable. Of course, if by some stretch of the imagination we were to suppose that the Constitution were some kind of contract, then we who are alive today would have inherited as successors-in-interest rights to amend or even cancel the contract, as individuals; but, of course, none of us, or our ancestors, legally empowered the framers of the Constitution, so we have no legal interest in it.

If the institution created by the Constitution were a trust, then we would call that document a declaration of trust; but, because no document can be found with the signatures of our fathers (our fathers, or legal guardians; not the nation’s fathers), and since no signatures survive accepting this trust, under no circumstances is the government (so-called) legally constituted as a trust of any kind.

The next object of our consideration are the representative bodies that call themselves legislatures, and especially that august body called Congress. The men and women who sit in these houses make claims of representing the people of the country, as delegates. Under the color of law these institutions have boldly demanded support from everyone, and when persuasion by prosecution and imprisonment fail, they use deadly force. This alone is unconscionable, and could release the people from the alleged social contract; but if we examine further, even worse deficiencies come to light.

Like the original writers of the Constitution, there is no evidence anywhere that anyone legally appointed any particular representative to be his or her agent in any way. While the people whom these legislatures will impose their law upon are clearly identified, the people who are ostensibly liable for the acts of these agents are no where to be found!

Furthermore, if the Constitution were a contract, and those who claim authority under it attempt to do things outside of its original intent (such as to reduce the freedom of the other party to the pact), then the contract is voidable by default. The impact of these legislators could also be likened to undue influence, as every act of the legislatures is aimed at destroying the requisite free will of the very same people with whom they have contracted to provide the equal protection of the law.

It is a vested right of all human beings to enter into contracts and agreements, with the full power to cancel them at a later date. Any denial of this right is a denial of the ultimate authority, the allodial title and possession of the individual over himself. Any individual who lacks the ownership of his own body, and the fruits of its labor, is not free.

It has been set forth that even though technically at fault, the entire system is justified by implied consent. This is not so, as one cannot give even implied consent under a state of duress. The fact is that the people who obey the rules of these legislators do so not out of respect, but out of fear. They do not feel bound to obey the legislators, or their legally appointed agents, the police.

To finish the point, in the common law homicide, mayhem, arson, robbery, burglary, larceny and rescue of a felon are felonies, or True Crimes. Aside from constitutional fraud-in-factum, the legislators, and those who vote or appoint them, also commit acts of constructive fraud, by acts, omissions and concealments which effectively establish a breach of legal duty (Social Security, for example, has been represented as an insurance program). Because municipal corporations (cities and counties) enjoy franchises of the legislatures, it could be said that a criminal conspiracy exists, taxation being nothing short of robbery (robbery is the taking of property of another by violence or fear). DEA, FBI, and CIA agents commit burglary regularly, which is the entering of a building in the night to commit a felony. People who are killed when agents of the legislators (police) are besieging enemies of the legislators are victims of homicide, because the legislators have no lawful evidence that anyone delegated to them any authority whatsoever; and even then, that authority could not extend further than the property of the legislators and those for whom they are agents.

The doctrine of self-help remains the cornerstone of de jure social policy, regardless of de facto political conditions. But the tendency of the legislators and their agents is to retaliate against those who do not accept them as the sole legal authority of the state. The state claims absolute power, however, there are no principals who possess absolute liability for the actions done under the pretense of this power. When it is said that the People are sovereign, then we ask how, and of what?

If they are sovereign as a group, then they are not sovereign at all, especially if none of them enjoy the rights of sovereignty; but instead they are allowed the use of what they think they possess (by mortgage), by those who are sovereign. On the other hand, if each is sovereign, so that every person has the rights of sovereignty over himself and his property, then each is capable of entering into a social contract; whereas, in the previous concept the individual is a perpetual child, a ward of the state, and is not legally capable of entering into ANY contract. Because a constitution is a living body of law it is the agreement made between living people. Its reduction to a document which conveys privileges and authority which its sponsors, promoters and principals have no right to convey is illegal, and their well-publicized activities prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that every legislator, partisan, bureaucrat, agent and voter did intentionally do those things by concerted action which would accomplish the unlawful things described herein, with full knowledge of the end results of their individual participation.

Those lands, buildings and other properties which the legislators instructed their agents to take were seized under color of law with undue influence, duress, and in some instances deadly and unlawful force; which adds an additional charge of larceny. Considering, also, that all of the protests of the people who are supposedly represented by the legislators are dismissed lightly, it cannot be implied by any known process of law that any social contract exists at this time which is legally or morally binding upon the commonwealth of humanity.

Therefore the true conscience of the court is the conscience of each individual, and all the many individuals constitute a court of world opinion. It is up to the court of the world, THE PEOPLE, to invalidate the inconscionable contracts imposed upon us outside of the law, that we may enter into contracts which protect us and give us the equal protection of the law. All instruments of coercion must be renounced once and for all by all of humanity, or we shall perish as a race. All false authority must be denounced. The Law must be upheld.

LET JUSTICE BE DONE!

Legal terms from the Law Dictionary, Barrons Educational Series (1995)